From the Telegraph:
The Bush administration got a lot of things wrong – but at least they usually had some idea of who America's adversaries were and who America’s friends were. For example, Bush’s policy of maintaining the special relationship with Britain was a simple recognition of the close bonds of alliance, friendship and interests that the British and Americans have had since World War I.
In contrast, Obama and his Secretary of State Hillary Clinton are apparently clueless about some of the most basic aspects of foreign policy: supporting one's friends and fencing in one's adversaries. The declaration of neutrality on the issue of the sovereignty of the Falklands issued by the US State Department is clear proof of the uselessness of the Obama administration.
In the grand scheme of things it makes little sense for America to give moral support to the Kirchner government in Argentina. Kirchner is no friend of the US and Kirchner’s government is in deep domestic trouble for its gross mismanagement of the economy and its attempts to suppress the press criticism of the regime at home. One has to wonder what benefit America gets out of hurting Britain on this issue. Perhaps Obama thinks that the more Leftist Latin American regimes will somehow approve of the US. If that is the case, he is truly mistaken, as most Latin American nations dislike the Argentineans, and have little sympathy for the mess Argentina got into over the Falklands.
But this mess is just typical of the drift in US foreign policy – if one can say that it even HAS a coherent foreign policy these days. As I said, at the core of the problem is a simple inability to recognise and support our friends over adversaries. In his first year in office Obama made numerous apologies for America’s past to the Third World, he effusively greeted the Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez, he bowed low to the Saudi ruler, and called for a "reset" of relations with Russia – all the while implying that America was at fault for all these problems. At the same time he rudely undermined the security of America's Eastern European allies by cancelling the ballistic missile defence with no notice and no prior discussion, he failed to push for a free trade agreement with Colombia – America’s strongest ally in South America – and he supported Chavez’s allies when they tried (luckily unsuccessfully) to unseat a democratic and pro-US government in Honduras.
When Ronald Reagan was president and Britain and Argentina went to war over the Falklands, we sided with the UK.
I'm siding with the UK.
Related posts:
Al Haig is gone, meanwhile Argentina seeking UN help over Falklands claim
Obama doesn't view UK relationship as special
Technorati tags: current affairs UK argentina falklands Obama Barack Obama
1 comment:
From one country with very few friends in the world to another country with very few friends in the world thanks for your support.
The Falklands are as Argentine as Texas is Mexican.
Us Brits see more chance of Northern Island voting to become part of The Irish republic or Scotland voting for complete independence than the Falklands ever becoming Argentine. That is why this is offensive and silly to expect us to even discuss this.
Also, the term 'Malvinas' is offensive to Falkland Islanders due to the treatment they received by the occupiers in 1982 which is why Falkland Island websites in Spanish use the term Islas Falklands.
Post a Comment