Tuesday, October 21, 2008

Obama's nonsensical tax policy

Is America ready for four years of this nonsense? From the Wall Street Journal:

Now we know: 95% of Americans will get a "tax cut" under Barack Obama after all. Those on the receiving end of a check will include the estimated 44% of Americans who will owe no federal income taxes under his plan.

In most parts of America, getting money back on taxes you haven't paid sounds a lot like welfare. Ah, say the Obama people, you forget: Even those who pay no income taxes pay payroll taxes for Social Security. Under the Obama plan, they say, these Americans would get an income tax credit up to $500 based on what they are paying into Social Security.

Just two little questions: If people are going to get a tax refund based on what they pay into Social Security, then we're not really talking about income tax relief, are we? And if what we're really talking about is payroll tax relief, doesn't that mean billions of dollars in lost revenue for a Social Security trust fund that is already badly underfinanced?

Austan Goolsbee, the University of Chicago economic professor who serves as one of Sen. Obama's top advisers, discussed these issues during a recent appearance on Fox News. There he stated that the answer to the first question is that these Americans are getting an income tax rebate. And the answer to the second is that the money would not actually come out of Social Security.

"You can't just cut the payroll tax because that's what funds Social Security," Mr. Goolsbee told Fox's Shepard Smith. "So if you tried to do that, you would undermine the Social Security Trust Fund."

Complete, utter nonsense.

Related post:

Wolf Blitzer bites Obama economic adviser with on-air fact check

Technorati tags:

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

The Obama plan balances the tax code so that you and I and Paris Hilton and Donald Trump each contributes to our nation what we can truly afford.

The McCain plan shifts the tax code even further toward benefiting Paris and the Donald, by placing a heavier burden on you and I and our children (and their children).

Which do you support? Balance, or a heavier burden on Joe Sixpacks like you and I?

Marathon Pundit said...

Oh...Obama, heaven forbid if he becomes president, will pick almost everyone's pocket.

Anonymous said...

Costs a lot a money to run the best country in the history of the world.

Neither of us, John, enjoys paying our share of that cost. But I, for one, realize there's no such thing as a free lunch and I'm not so greedy as to whine about it either.