What the people of Georgia have accomplished in terms of democratic governance, a Western orientation, and domestic reform is nothing short of remarkable. That makes Russia's recent actions against the Georgians all the more alarming. In the face of Russian aggression, the very existence of independent Georgia and the survival of its democratically-elected government are at stake.
In recent days Moscow has sent its tanks and troops across the internationally recognized border into the Georgian region of South Ossetia. Statements by Moscow that it was merely aiding the Ossetians are belied by reports of Russian troops in the region of Abkhazia, repeated Russian bombing raids across Georgia, and reports of a de facto Russian naval blockade of the Georgian coast. Whatever tensions and hostilities might have existed between Georgians and Ossetians, they in no way justify Moscow's path of violent aggression. Russian actions, in clear violation of international law, have no place in 21st century Europe.
The implications of Russian actions go beyond their threat to the territorial integrity and independence of a democratic Georgia. Russia is using violence against Georgia, in part, to intimidate other neighbors such as Ukraine for choosing to associate with the West and adhering to Western political and economic values. As such, the fate of Georgia should be of grave concern to Americans and all people who welcomed the end of a divided of Europe, and the independence of former Soviet republics. The international response to this crisis will determine how Russia manages its relationships with other neighbors. We have other important strategic interests at stake in Georgia, especially the continued flow of oil through the Baku-Tblisi-Ceyhan pipeline, which Russia attempted to bomb in recent days; the operation of a critical communication and trade route from Georgia through Azerbaijan and Central Asia; and the integrity an d influence of NATO, whose members reaffirmed last April the territorial integrity, independence, and sovereignty of Georgia.
In related news, Russia warned four nations that know a lot about their aggressive neighbor to the east. Last week Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland. Last week Latvian President Valdis Zatlers and his counterparts in the other three countries issued a statement that asked NATO and the European Union to oppose Russia's "imperialist" action in Georgia.
Russia's ambassador to Latvia responded, "One must not hurry on such serious issues, as serious mistakes can be made that have to be paid for a long time afterwards."
Mrs. Marathon Pundit emigrated from Latvia in 1991. I've talked with many Latvians who suffered from earlier Russian imperialism.
Zatlers is the man in the photograph planting a tree in Sece, Latvia--Mrs. Marathon Pundit's hometown--last summer. That's Little Marathon Pundit looking into the camera.
Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, Poland--and Georgia--have planted the seed of democracy on their soil. Russia is regressing.
Technorati tags: Latvia Latvija Valdis Zatlers Zatlers politics news John McCain McCain Russia Росси́я Путин საქართველო Georgia Poland Estonia Lithuania
8 comments:
Where is McCain finding his GIs in order to back up his bluster? Even Bush didn't go as far with the "tough talk" as the presumptuous GOP nominee who wants to emulate him.
Putin knows we're tied up by Iraq -- militarily, economically and politically... Why do you think he's acting with impunity?
"Why do you think he's acting with impunity?"
Because Europe is castrated and too frightened to act in their own best interest?
Because if the U.S. tried to do anything, lefty anti-war protestors would make us look like impotent idiots to the rest of the world?
Tied up in Iraq...
Yeah, we are beginning to be spread pretty thin doing the U.N.'s job with virtually no help from the rest of the world.
Do you think they'll begin to see the light before it's too late Rob?
Wake up world.
The UN was doing the UN's job in Iraq... Bush took it upon our nation to invade, hence the lack of help. Besides, I thought we were "winning" (whatever the definition of that is this moment).
Georgia, etc. want to join NATO for US support, not European.
Ha.
The U.N. was doin' Jack Sh** in Iraq.
Saddam was playin' them for the pedophilic fools they are!
Dream on Dude!
Russis has a weak economy, negative population growth, and a declining average life expectancy.
Southeastern Siberia has a growing Asian population--and China claims that land.
Russia has a lot to worry about.
As for their military, they didn't do too well in Chechnya, did they?
Grey,
The US and UK, acting under auspices of the UN, were enforcing the no-fly zones. Are you saying our fighter pilots weren't doing "jack sh**"?
The UN didn't find WMD in Iraq because there were none. President Bush apparently had to forge documents in order to make even a tenuous case for "selling" the invasion of Iraq.
You can deny reality all you want. It doesn't make it any less real.
--
John,
Tell the dead Georgians that the Russian military didn't do so well in Chechnya.
Reading comp:
I said the U.N. is inefficient at doing ANYTHING other than molesting young girls and boys.
Watch Rob, as the bring the conflict in Georgia to an end!
Darfur...
Rwanda,
Zimbabwe,
Etc, etc.
One CNN News piece particularly caught my attention:
Saddam was holding off the inspectors at the front gate while moving semi-truckloads of junk out the back gate.
Rob, have you ever seen the "Bizzaro Jerry" Seinfield episode?
You'd like it. I promise.
Grey,
You wrote "The U.N. was doin' Jack Sh** in Iraq. Saddam was playin' them for the pedophilic fools they are!"
Not "I said the U.N. is inefficient at doing ANYTHING other than molesting young girls and boys."
Doing jack sh** and being inefficient are two different things. The McCain campaign is being inefficient with its ads (polls are barely moving within their MoEs despite the spin from Camp McCain and the traditional media), but they are not "doin' jack sh**".
As for the UN inspectors in Iraq, they had been kicked out in a rush of Saddam bluster (it was politically expedient for him if Iran, etc. thought he had WMDs even if he didn't).
But under threat of invasion from the US, the UN inspectors were allowed in.
And they found nothing.
And then after the invasion, with free run of the country, the US' own inspectors found nothing.
Zilch.
As for the rest of the UN mandate, the USAF and RAF were running the northern and southern no-fly zones.
Again, are saying our own Air Force (or the British fighter pilots for that matter) weren't doing jack sh** (or, being inefficient)?
...Let's back up to my original point (which you've managed to distract away from). What on earth does this have to do with McCain making threats against Russia that he simply can't back up because Pres. Bush (with McCain's full and unending support) has tied up our military in Iraq?
Post a Comment