Islamic Society of Boston drops lawsuit against David Project, others

Earlier this month, friend of the blog Solomonia out in Boston put together a superb piece of original reporting called The Silencing.

Pulling a page from the CAIR playbook, the Islamic Society of Boston sued
Tthe David Project, Boston Herald, Fox-TV, and others for defamation. Simply put, the group, who is building a mosque in the Hub City's Roxbury neighborhood, has pretty clear ties to radical groups.

Rather than cleanse itself of these elements and coming clean, the Islamic Society of Boston decided to sue.

Surely, the Society thought the defendants would cave in and fall on their swords in collective PC guilt. But as Andy Whitehead of Anti-CAIR did in his legal tussle with CAIR, the Boston defendants held their ground.

And it was the Islamic Society of Boston who caved in.

Stand up to jerks like these. They're not used to people fighting back.

Pete Townshend of The Who phrased it best in "The Dirty Jobs" from his Quadrophenia masterpiece:

My karma tells me
You've been screwed again.
If you let them do it to you
You've got yourself to blame.
It's you who feels the pain
It's you that feels ashamed.

Don't feel ashamed when you fight for your rights.

Metaphorically speaking only of course, you should make the other side feel the pain when getting hit with a frivolous lawsuit.

Here is an excerpt from The David Project press release announcing the dropping of the suit by the ISB:

The David Project has announced that the Islamic Society of Boston ("ISB") and its officers have withdrawn all of their claims against all of the citizens who raised concerns about the ISB, its funding and its leadership, as well as all of their claims against the Boston Herald, Fox-TV and the various journalists whose investigative pieces about the ISB in 2003 and 2004 disclosed damaging information about the ISB and its controversial land deal with the Boston Redevelopment Authority ("BRA"). The ISB and its officers have abandoned all of their claims against all of the defendants they sued 2 years ago, without payment to the ISB or to them of any money whatsoever.

The ISB's decision to drop all of its claims against all of the 17 defendants it sued back in 2005 alleging "defamation" and accusing them of conspiring to violate its civil rights comes just months after the defendants--who included a Muslim cleric, a Christian political science professor and the Jewish daughter of Holocaust survivors, as well as Boston civic leader William Sapers and national terrorism expert Steven Emerson--had begun through their lawyers to conduct discovery into the ISB's financial records, its receipt of millions of dollars in funding from Saudi Arabian and other Middle Eastern sources, its contributions to certain organizations and the records of certain of its officers and directors. The ISB's abandonment of its lawsuits comes only weeks after two of its original Middle Eastern Trustees, Walid Fitaihi of Saudi Arabia and Ali Tobah of Egypt, suddenly resigned as Trustees just before they were required to submit themselves to the jurisdiction of the Massachusetts court hearing the case.

The David Project, whose public records litigation against the BRA forced the public disclosure of evidence regarding the below-fair-market land deal between the BRA and the ISB and the role played in that deal of BRA Deputy Director Muhammed Ali Salaam, will proceed exactly as before with its litigation, seeking the remainder of the documents presently withheld by the BRA. That litigation, The David Project v. Boston Redevelopment Authority, is on file in Suffolk Superior Court in Boston.

"We were determined from the beginning to act the way citizens should, by asking questions about this matter and by refusing to be intimidated into staying silent," said David Project founder and President Charles Jacobs, "and we intend to continue as we have before. Indeed, the evidence that has emerged about the transaction, about the BRA's failure to do due diligence into those whom it chose to subsidize and about the funding and the leadership of the organization that received this public subsidy is of extremely deep concern. That evidence not only vindicates the reporting of the courageous journalists whose investigative work broke the story back in 2003 and 2004, but validates many times over the concerns expressed by the good and decent citizens—Muslims, Christians and Jews- who refused to stay silent."

"Those citizens were vilified by the ISB for having had the courage to speak out", said Jacobs. "The ISB's abandonment of its claims without payment of one dollar to them, coming as it does as the ISB was ordered to turn over evidence, speaks more eloquently than anything else could about the truth of what these citizens said, about the validity of their concerns, and about the lack of merit to the ISB's allegations that they had been 'defamed' and had been financially 'damaged'. Above all, the ISB's ultimate abandonment of its lawsuits speaks eloquently about the importance of refusing to be bullied and intimidated into silence."

"This has never been about the right of all people to worship, and to construct houses of worship, which is an important right possessed equally by all people, warranting great respect," said Jacobs. "What it has been about is specific evidence about specific leaders of a specific organization, and about evidence regarding the funding of that organization and those whom it, in turn, was funding. The threat of Islamic extremism in the United States and elsewhere is a real one. Many of the most courageous and forceful individuals speaking out about this threat are themselves Muslims, and they deserve the support of all of us. The victory we have achieved in this case is a victory for many, but perhaps especially for them, as it bolsters and encourages them, and sends a message on their behalf that intimidation will not work."

ISB's dropping of the defamation suit is another victory for the blogosphere. It's effect is perhaps not as immediately apparent as the Rathergate episode, but its impact may end up being just as profound.

Martin Solomon of Solomonia has been blogging on this case for at least a couple years. Well, done, man. Relax and have a Samuel Adams.

Related post:

In Boston: A place worse than the Bridgeview Mosque

Technorati tags: law religion islam muslims Boston massachusetts CAIR