Thursday, May 05, 2011

NLRB law-inventing round-up

Here is today's collection of stories about the NLRB's law-inventing in regards to the Boeing case.

From The Herald of Everett, Washington:

The National Labor Relations Board's recent challenge to Boeing over the second 787 production line is malign nonsense. Laughably meritless on its face, it nonetheless poses a serious threat to both economic recovery and economic freedom. Such things must always be confronted and overcome.

Briefly, the complaint filed by the NLRB's acting general counsel says Boeing engaged in unfair labor practices as it considered its expansion plans. So, 17 months after the company announced its decision and subsequently invested billions of dollars, hiring more than 1,000 workers in North Charleston, S.C., the complaint would have the company move the work to Washington. The breathtaking audacity is beyond caricature.

In a more sane world, business leaders could briefly mock the bureaucrats' outrageous overreach and move on to productive work, like creating jobs, building planes, and expanding economic opportunity.

Instead, the NLRB complaint casts a shadow over a sputtering recovery stretching from Everett to North Charleston. Read narrowly as a beef between the union and the company, the complaint is significant in its own right. But that's too limited a view. What's at stake here is the fundamental right of any employer to act in the best interests of its customers, shareholders and, yes, its employees by expanding to where the best business conditions prevail.
The Charleston Regional Business Journal:

Responding to the National Labor Relations Board complaint against Boeing, Republican Sens. Lindsey Graham and Jim DeMint from South Carolina and Lamar Alexander, a Tennessee Republican, are introducing a bill today to protect right-to-work states from federal interference.

"The 'Right to Work Protection Act,' I think, is a very solid piece of legislation that is going to serve the country as a whole," Graham said on the Senate floor Tuesday. "I do appreciate this legislation because it would preserve the ability of a state to go down that road without suffering at the federal level."

Graham said the act will prohibit the federal government from punishing right-to-work states through contract awards or federal action.

"The concept of right to work is really at stake here," Graham said.
From the Charleston Post and Courier, a letter to President Obama from Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC):
Dear President Obama:

In your State of the Union address, you said: "We know what it takes to compete for the jobs and industries of our time. We need to out-innovate, out-educate, and out-build the rest of the world. We have to make America the best place on Earth to do business."

We agree.

Global competition for business and jobs is more important than ever as our country struggles to recover from the lingering recession and cope with the massive debt burden imposed on the economy by increased government spending.

Unfortunately, recent actions by your handpicked political appointees at the National Labor Relations Board are making it more difficult for America to win the future.

The NLRB, at the behest of Acting General Counsel Lafe Solomon, has taken unprecedented legal action against The Boeing Company to prevent it from expanding productions into South Carolina, a state that assures workers the freedom not to join a union as a condition of employment.

We consider this an attack on millions of workers in 22 right-to-work states, as well as a government-led act of intimidation against American companies that should have the freedom to choose to build plants in right-to-work states.

If the NLRB prevails, it will only encourage companies to make their investments in foreign nations, moving jobs and economic growth overseas.

America will not win the future if Washington penalizes workers in states that have discovered winning economic strategies. Right-to-work states have faster job growth, faster income growth, and faster population growth than forced-unionism states.

This winning strategy should be duplicated nationwide. Instead, successful workers rights are being stamped out by political appointees who serve at your pleasure and have not been confirmed by the Senate.

You nominated Mr. Solomon to become General Counsel for NLRB and serve a full four-year term on January 5, 2011, yet, members of the Senate have not been able to vet him. Mr. Solomon has not appeared for a Senate confirmation hearing, nor has he been subjected to a full Senate confirmation vote.

Additionally, you granted a recess appointment to Craig Becker, a former lawyer for the Service Employees International Union and AFL-CIO, to become one of the five members of the NLRB's powerful board over widespread, bipartisan objections in the Senate to his nomination.

The Senate rejected his nomination in February 2010. All 41 Republican senators wrote you a letter in March 2010 urging you not to give Mr. Becker a recess appointment, which you did later that month, effectively circumventing the will of the U.S. Senate.

The Senate has been unacceptably denied the ability to exercise its constitutional duty of advice and consent in regards to the NLRB.

In light of the NLRB's recent actions that would have a deleterious effect on job creation and economic opportunity across the country, it is time to hold the NLRB accountable.

We urge you to withdraw both Mr. Solomon's and Mr. Becker's nominations to their respective positions immediately.

If not, we will vigorously oppose both nominations, vote against cloture and use all procedural tools available to defeat their confirmation in the Senate.

Jim DeMint, a Republican, is South Carolina's junior U.S. senator. This letter was also signed by Republican Sens. Lindsey Graham, S.C.; Kelly Ayotte, N.H.; Richard Burr, N.C.; Tom Coburn, Okla.; Chuck Grassley, Iowa; Orrin Hatch, Utah; Kay Bailey Hutchinson, Texas; James Inhofe, Okla.; Ron Johnson, Wis.; Jon Kyl, Ariz.; Mike Lee, Utah; John McCain, Ariz.; Rand Paul, Ky.; Jim Risch, Idaho; Richard Shelby, Ala.; John Thune, S.D.; Pat Toomey, Pa.; and David Vitter, La.
Technorati tags:

No comments: