Friday, June 12, 2009

Should union bosses have salary limits too?

In yesterday's Washington Times, Amanda Carpenter brought up a good point. Since Barack Obama, the Czar of all the Czars, has appointed a new czar who will probably end up limiting CEO pay, should union bosses face the same scrutiny?

Business groups are daring President Barack Obama to impose pay caps on labor union bosses in light of indications the White House will limit how much corporate executives can be paid.

President Obama has argued "corporate greed" has contributed to the economic crisis and appointed a "compensation czar" to review executive pay for several companies receiving taxpayer bailout money Wednesday. Now White House officials have told the press they will pursue legislation should be enacted to limit executive pay in private companies through nonbinding shareholders votes.

The Workforce Fairness Institute, which has lobbied heavily for the defeat of the Employee Free Choice Act to ease organization rules for labor unions, points to a 2008 Hudson Institute study that suggests unions have short-changed benefits for their rank and file in favor or generous executive compensation packages and to pad the coffers of their political allies, who are mostly Democrats.

"On average, the 21 largest unions pension plans had less than 70 percent of the funds that they would need to cover their total obligations, and none were fully funded," the study said. "Seven were less than 65 percent funded. Yet 23 officer and staff funds from the same unions had 88.2 percent of the funding they would need to pay promise pensions, including seven full funded plans and another 13 with at least 80 percent of the required funds."

Related post:

Obama and the Dems: Not transparent on unions

Technorati tags:

No comments: