(Video) Trump says we're going to drain the swamp in Washington

Yes, Washington was really built on a swamp. But it was never properly drained.

It's time to call in a specialist.

Where is the media uproar over Obama's lies about ObamaCare?

One tactic of the dishonest media is piling on, such pushing out story, after story, well, after story, about accusations of sexual misconduct about Donald Trump. Yes, there has been more than one accuser. I get it.

But the lies of ObamaCare certainly effect many more Americans than the sex life of Donald Trump, and yes, Bill Clinton too.

As he was selling ObamaCare, President Obama promised that, "If you like your health care plan, you can keep it." That whopper of a falsehood was deemed the Lie of the Year by Poltifact three years ago.

But where is the piling on? Oh wait, I know, it's old news, one of the mainstream media's favorite canards for avoiding covering a story that doesn't fit their narrative.

Old news, yes. But one that plagues Americans daily. Health insurers are cancelling ObamaCare plans everywhere. Where is the piling on?

Obama also vowed that ObamaCare would lower the average family's health insurance premiums by $2,500. Politifact deemed that a broken promise.

ObamaCare is on the verge of collapse, which Donald Trump has pointed out. But grabbing a p*ssy is easier for the corrupt and lazy media to cover. Trump predicts that ObamaCare will fail next year. If he's proven right, we won't hear about Trump's prognostication from the compliant, Democratic-controlled media.

Hillary Clinton, according to a Wikileaks email, seems to favor an "unraveling" of ObamaCare, which means the door will be open to government-run health care, what the libs euphemistically call single-payer. Publicly, Clinton supports ObamaCare. What does she really think?

Where's that story? Or should I say, story, after story?

After story.

Enquirer, which broke John Edwards love child story, has sex exposé on Hillary

When all of the media outlets were looking the other way, the National Enquirer broke the story about onetime Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards fathering a child with his mistress, Rielle Hunter.

From the Enquirer:

Hillary Clinton is a secret sex freak who paid fixers to set up illicit romps with both men AND women!

That's the blockbuster revelation from a former Clinton family operative who is sensationally breaking ranks with his one-time bosses to speak to The National ENQUIRER in a bombshell 9-page cover story — on newsstands Wednesday.

"I arranged a meeting for Hillary and a woman in an exclusive Beverly Hills hotel," the man, who was hired by the Clintons, via a Hollywood executive, to cover up their scandals, told The ENQUIRER.

More...

"While I was there, I helped her slip out of a back exit for a one-on-one session with the other woman. It was made to look casual, leaving quietly [rather] that being caught up in the melee … but really it was for something presumably more sordid."

The source also claims Hillary had an affair with White House aide and Arkansas Clintonista Vince Foster, who committed suicide in 1993.

(Video) Dead men voting: Who are they casting their ballots for?

These dead voters almost certainly vote for Democrats.

Former Justice Department official J. Christian Adams explains why.

Rasmussen: Voters say media, not Russians, swaying the election

I've always known that the media was in the tank for the Democrats. Now many more people have figured that out.

From Rasmussen:

Most voters aren't buying the story that the Russians are trying to manipulate the election for Donald Trump but think the U.S. media is trying to swing things for Hillary Clinton.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 56% of Likely U.S. Voters believe it's more likely that many in the media are working to get Clinton elected president. Just 26% disagree and say it's more likely that the Russian government is working to get Trump elected. Eighteen percent (18%) are not sure. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

Dem operative caught on video inciting Chicago anti-Trump riot, ex-con husband of Dem congresswoman played role

Of course the March anti-Donald Trump riot at the University of Illinois-Chicago Pavilion was not spontaneous.

From Independent Journal Review:

Videographer James O'Keefe has unveiled a jaw-dropping video that appears to show alleged Hillary Clinton operatives illegally working together with her Super PAC and the Democratic National Committee to coordinate campaign moves. These moves included starting the riot that shut down a Donald Trump rally in Chicago last March.

O'Keefe says that his series of reports, one of which was released Monday and can be seen above, shows illegal collusion between between Democratic operatives and the Clinton campaign:

This investigation has revealed compelling evidence of a dark money conspiracy, a violation of federal campaign coordination laws between Hillary Clinton's campaign, Priorities USA, Hillary's Super PAC and the Democratic National Committee.

Among the allegations the video makes is that a man who works with the Democratic National Committee Rapid Response Team, Aaron (Minter) Black, coordinated the violence which turned into a riot in Chicago and which resulted in a Donald Trump rally being canceled.

Robert Creamer, the ex-con husband of, gasp, my congresscritter Jan Schakowksy, a hard-left Democrat, also played a role in these dark tatics.

"I'm not suggesting we wait around, we need to start this shit right away," Creamer is caught boasting on video.

Creamer is the founder of Democracy Partners.

He also bragged, "The campaign is fully in it."

Creamer went to prison as a result of a check-kiting scheme, which is something left out of his biography on the Democracy Partners web site.

In 2002, before his prison term, Creamer worked for the campaign of future felon Rod Blagojevich,

Related post:

Liberals laud book by ex-con husband of Rep. Jan Schakowsky

2012: Romney received no votes in 37 Chicago precincts

Romney's version of the Trump
Train before the 2012 IL Primary

Man, do you think that maybe Mitt Romney could have managed to win ten-or-so votes in some of those Chicago precincts where Barack Obama won unanimously? Even if some Chicagoans voted for the 2012 Republican nominee for president by mistake? But in 37 Chicago precincts "Mittens" came out empty handed four autumns ago.

You can look it up.

I remember reading, I believe in Mike Royko's best-selling book about Mayor Richard J. Daley, Boss,when a Democratic precinct captain bragged, "I carried my precinct 300-0!" But he was quickly admonished, "Are you nuts? Do you want the feds in here? Give the Republicans ten votes."

Okay, I probably didn't get the quotes exactly right, but the bad old days of Democratic machine politics weren't so awful. There was honor among thieves.

Back to the recent past: And those were some big washouts, as high as 669-0 for Barack Obama, which was almost as bad for Romney as a typical Big 10 football Saturday is for the Rutgers Scarlet Knights.

96 percent of journalists' prez campaign contributions going to Hillary

Legendary conservative columnist Robert Novak famously said, "Always love your country, but never trust your government."

If Novak was still with us he would have added, "And never trust the mainstream media."

From the Center for Public Integrity:

Conventional journalistic wisdom holds that reporters and editors are referees on politics' playing field — bastions of neutrality who mustn't root for Team Red or Team Blue, either in word or deed.

But during this decidedly unconventional election season, during which “the media” has itself become a prominent storyline, several hundred news professionals have aligned themselves with Clinton or Trump by personally donating money to one or the other.

In all, people identified in federal campaign finance filings as journalists, reporters, news editors or television news anchors — as well as other donors known to be working in journalism — have combined to give more than $396,000 to the presidential campaigns of Clinton and Trump, according to a Center for Public Integrity analysis.

The Center for Public Integrity was the recipient of a Pulitzer Prize in 2014.

Politico "journalist" Glenn Thrush sent article to Clinton big shot to edit

WikiLeaks strikes again! Another hack "journalist," this time Glenn Thrush, the chief White House correspondent for reputedly-centrist Politico, was caught sending an article draft to Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta for him to edit.

From Lifezette:

"Because I have become a hack I will send u the whole section that pertains to u [sic]," Thrush wrote to Podesta. "Please don't share or tell anyone I did this … tell me if I f***ed up anything," he continued.

"OTR: No problems here," Podesta responded.

OTR of course means "off the record." Well, that doesn't matter now.

Oh, even Thrush admits he's a hack. Too funny! But he did fuck up.

I have a new slogan, this one is for the lamestream media: Make Journalism Great Again!

Related post:

The media is the enemy of the American people, UPDATED

Too many coincidences in left-wing media assault against Trump

The coordinated left-wing media assault on Donald Trump, the sudden appearance of sexual harassment victims, including one from over thirty years ago, and the release of his tax returns, which someone illegally obtained, is unprecedented.

Let's say, hypothetically, the harassment charges are true. All of them. When did the media possess information about these attacks? Last month? In July? Last year? If it's anything but very recently, then the media is not reporting the news, it's guilty of shaping it. Then the media rather wait to foist an October surprise against Trump and sway the presidential election.

Let's say, hypothetically again, all of these charges are false. Wouldn't it be fair to Trump and the American public to have the time to refute, in Trump's case, or digest and judge, in the case of the voters, these allegations?

Of course it would be. But the hyper-leftist media is not interested in fairness.

Andrew Malcom, a fine gentleman who I've met a couple times, has more:

A few things you’re unlikely to read elsewhere: Donald Trump's presidential candidacy – and Americans’ ability to choose their next leader – is being destroyed by a sequence of events way too well orchestrated to be coincidental.

This is not about the billionaire's qualifications or disqualifications to move into the Oval Office, his braggadocio, his awful manners, alleged sexual harassment, crass behavior, ostentatious wealth.

Americans have had unsavory political leaders before, most recently Hillary Clinton’s charming unfaithful hubby who, among other things, received oral sex from an intern in that same revered office. And then lied about it to authorities.

This is about Americans being politically manipulated quite cleverly, something people do not appreciate, if they're allowed to be aware of it. Recent events could be a movie called "Wag the Dog – Again."