CAIR, the Council on American Islamic Relations, uses bullying tactics with its detractors in attempt to silence its critics. It's a strategy they used with Andy Whitehead of Anti-CAIR.
As with an approaching shark--a hit in the snout is surprisingly effective in scaring the predator off--fighting back and shooing CAIR away once you show them you're not afraid of them works well.
From FrontPage Magazine:
Whitehead, not easily intimidated, responded by filing over 300 separate interrogatories, requests of documents and requests for admission. CAIR then filed an amended “motion for judgement” dropping the allegations regarding CAIR’s ties to Hamas and terror were false and defamatory, some discovery answers, and a motion for protective order. Whitehead then filed a motion to compel, seeking a court order obligating CAIR to answer his information requests.
In court, CAIR was asked to admit that “Hamas murdered innocent civilians” to which it replied: “Objection, calls for legal conclusion…” Questioned as to whether CAIR has had “one or more communications with Abu Musa Marzook?” The Plaintiff’s reply was, “To be subject to Plaintiff’s motion for Protective Order…”, restricting the response to Whitehead’s counsel.
Called to confirm Article Seven of the Hamas Charter which states that “the Hamas has been looking forward to implementing Allah’s promise whatever time it might take. The Prophet, peace be upon him, said: The time will not come until Muslims will fight the Jews, until the Jews hide behind rocks and trees, which will cry: O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, come on and kill him!” CAIR again refused to respond by stating: “CAIR objects because the Hamas Charter speaks for itself and because the Plainiff is without means to obtain current, accurate, and reliable copy of the Hamas Charter.”
Does that mean CAIR has a copy of the current Hamas charter?
CAIR withdrew its suit against Whitehead, and the statement the self-described Muslim civil rights group objected to is still up on Anti-CAIR.
Let there be no doubt that the Council on American-Islamic Relations is a terrorist supporting front organization that is partially funded by terrorists, and that CAIR wishes nothing more than the implementation of Sharia law in America.
More from FrontPage:
But not everyone has the fortitude to punch the shark in the nose. More from FrontPage Magazine:
Why did CAIR drop its lawsuit against Andrew Whitehead? Apparently it feared exposure that would reveal its leaders connections to terrorist groups like Hamas. If that is the case, namely, CAIR’s fear of exposure, why has the media been silent on this matter? (Whitehead's attorney Reed) Rubinstein explained, “CAIR is protected by the mainstream media,” which he said, “has studiously ignored a decade of evidence, and has, instead, adopted a ‘see no evil, speak no evil’ stance.”
CAIR's headquarters, conveniently located just east of Capitol Hill, is also quite close to the numerous mainstream media Washington bureaus. They should be sounding an alarm about CAIR.
Related post: CAIR-Chicago recommended that DePaul fire Klocek
Technorati tags:
CAIR 
Hamas 
law 
terrorism 
Islam 
lawsuits
No comments:
Post a Comment