Thomas Lifson and Richard Baehr have an excellent summary on the American Thinker.
Meanwhile, news of Wesley Thompson's deposition has come my way. Wes is the former DePaul Student Government Association president who was a eyewitness to the September 15, 2004 heated discussion between former Professor Thomas Klocek and some Muslim students. The students didn't like what Klocek said, their complaints led to the professor's dismissal from DePaul after 15 years as an adjunct faculty member there.
On a personal note, I met Wes at the Ward Churchill dust-up at DePaul's Lincoln Park campus last October. Even though he knew I was a regular critic of DePaul, he couldn't have been nicer to me.
(And no, we did not talk about the Klocek case.)
Press release comes to the blog via TC Public Relations.
(June 1, 2006, Chicago ) Yesterday, the deposition of Wesley Thompson, DePaul University student and former student body president, was filed in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, Law Division. Statements made by Thompson, an eyewitness to the events, support Professor Thomas Klocek's position, that his debate with students over conflicts in the Middle East did not justify DePaul's suspension of him based on bad conduct. ThompsonÂ’s deposition contradicts public statements made by DePaul University officials.
According to DePaul's president the Rev. DennisHoltschneiderider in his letter published in the Rocky Mountain News (April 9, 2005):"The incident involving Klocek is about inappropriate behavior directed at our students--we cannot maintain an academically free environment when students feel threatened...
"He (Klocek) raised his voice, threw pamphlets at students...
"As an adjunct professor who is hired on an as-needed basis each term, Klocek does not receive the same privileges as full-time tenured professors."
In contrast, Thompson's deposition that records his eyewitness account of what happened between Klocek and the Students for Justice in Palestine states:
Excerpts from Deposition:
Question to Thompson: It was not what you would call a threat to hit anyone?
Thompson's Response: "I didn't feel that there was a threat of physical violence..."
Question to Thompson: Did you hear a conversation at a noise level that would be above what we would call normal conversational level?
Thompson's Response: "...I can remember Salma (member of Students for Justice in Palestine) responding to something in sort of... not a loud voice, but when you get mad and you respond snappy, well, you know, something like that."
Question to Thompson: So she raised her voice somewhat?
Thompson's Response: But it wasn't yelling or anything, but then I believe I remember Professor Klocek responded in kind."
Question to Thompson: And he raised his voice to the same level?
Thompson's Response: "Yes, He wasn't yelling or anything."
Question to Thompson: Did you observe anybody throw anything?
Thompson's Response: "I did not."
"It's encouraging to see that what transpired between Professor Klocek and the students at the student activities fair outside the classroom was simply a heated debate. A common, non-threatening activity expected on most university campuses," said Andy Norman, Klocek's attorney with Mauck & Baker.
Background of Case:
A defamation suit was filed in Illinois' Cook County Court in June 2005 charging that DePaul University and its leadership defamed Professor Thomas Klocek when DePaul publicly characterized arguments he presented to members of Palestinian and Muslim student groups as racist and bigoted. DePaul also accused Klocek of abusing his position as a professor to demean students. The suit seeks damages against DePaul for maligning Klocek's integrity and professional competence. The defendants named include: DePaul University; Rev. Dennis Holtschneider, President of DePaul; and Susanne Dumbleton, Dean of DePaul's School for New Learning.
Technorati tags: DePaul Chicago Illinois Free Speech Academic freedom Thomas Klocek Law AcademiaIsrael politics Ward Churchill Slander Muslimsمسلم
No comments:
Post a Comment